Canadian Climate Policy
An economist pretending to be a geologist
By Andrew on February 15, 2012
Last night, I wrote a long post on the EU Fuel Quality Directive, on which a vote is expected next week. The Fuel Quality Directive has attracted a great deal of attention here in Canada because it would assign a higher emissions rating to Alberta oilsands than to other sources of crude oil, and I have […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, climate change, oilsands | 1 Response
Some clarification please, Mr. Mulcair.
By Andrew on December 10, 2011
Yesterday, NDP leadership candidate and environmental hawk Thomas Mulcair announced his intention to implement a, “new comprehensive plan to combat climate change.” According to his press release, “Mulcair’s new plan would still be industry-focused and based on the principle that ‘polluters pay’, but it would expand beyond the 700 largest emitters in Canada to cover […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, climate change, election, energy, oilsands | Tagged ndp | 6 Responses
Globe Article and Reader Comments
By Andrew on December 10, 2011
Last week, I summarized my two (#1 and #2) posts on Kyoto compliance and withdrawal into a shorter piece on the Globe and Mail’s Economy Lab. One of my regular readers, who unfortunately prefers to remain in anonymity and wrap his/her sometimes insightful comments in insults and derision, points out that there are important differences […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, climate change | 9 Responses
Canada’s climate challenge: 1 out of 3 ain’t good enough.
By Andrew on December 5, 2011
Canada needs to offer up more than easy soundbites and appeals to Nature editorials to move from a climate change laggard to a leader. Today, Canada re-affirmed its position that it would not be signing on to a new commitment period for the Kyoto protocol, and you can count me among those who expect an […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, climate change, oilsands | 9 Responses
Clarification on compliance and withdrawal
By Andrew on November 29, 2011
In yesterday’s post I had equated withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol with not agreeing to targets under a second commitment period. I’ve since gotten clarification on a couple of aspects of this.
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy | 20 Responses
Why the Harper government’s decision on Kyoto is both correct and not surprising
By Andrew on November 28, 2011
With the start of the Durban climate change negotiations, it was suddenly news that Canada would not confirm or deny it’s intentions to abandon the Kyoto Protocol – this may have been news to some, but I can’t understand why it would be news to anyone who has been following GHG policy in this country.
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy | 7 Responses
Thinking in terms of renovated bungalows, not megatons.
By Andrew on September 18, 2011
Greenhouse gas emissions are an abstract concept for most people. Ask a sample of Canadians what Canada’s annual GHG emissions are, and you’ll likely get a very broad range of answers (they’re about 750 million metric tons (Mt) per year). The figures are so abstract that errors like Gasland producer Josh Fox claiming that Canada’s […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, oilsands | 31 Responses
The AUC and Maxim Power: No steps forward, 3 steps back.
By Andrew on July 8, 2011
Last week, on June 30th, the Alberta Utilities Commission approved the Milner Expansion Project, a 500Mw coal-fired generating facility, to be built 20km north of Grande Cache, west of Edmonton. This decision raises more issues that I can possibly cover in a single post, so I’ll narrow it down to my top 3. First and […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, energy | 4 Responses
David Roberts and Stephen Gordon are saying almost the same thing about green jobs
By Andrew on June 29, 2011
Over the last couple of days, my Twitter feed has been swamped with discussion about green jobs. Yesterday, Worthwhile Canadian Initiative blogger and Laval Professor Stephen Gordon (@stephenfgordon) posted a piece on the Globe and Mail’s Economy Lab arguing that presenting, “the employment opportunities generated by a set of proposals…as an additional benefit of the […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, Renewable Energy Policy | Leave a response
Twice the offsets, half the credibility for the offset system
By Andrew on June 24, 2011
The Governments of Alberta and Canada announced today that a final funding formula had been reached for Shell’s Quest project, a carbon capture and storage operation housed at Shell’s Scotford Upgrader in Fort Saskatchewan. The fact that the funding model has been agreed upon is great news, since although I have been critical of Alberta’s […]
Posted in Canadian Climate Policy, oilsands | 2 Responses